This revised guide reorganises Hasaranga and Pathirana Fitness Tests: SLC Rules and IPL Clearance into a clearer, more practical format while preserving the original advice and context.
Updated and fact-checked: Sri Lanka Cricket confirmed in early April 2026 that Wanindu Hasaranga and Matheesha Pathirana were among centrally contracted players yet to complete mandatory physical-performance testing. SLC had made passing the test a condition for IPL No Objection Certificates, with injury rehabilitation affecting the timing for both players.
What SLC’s rule required
Sri Lanka Cricket announced in March that centrally contracted players seeking clearance for the 2026 IPL had to pass its Physical Performance Test before receiving a No Objection Certificate. The policy was part of an eight-week conditioning programme and applied to domestic clearance as well as overseas participation.
By 6 April, ESPN reported that 15 of 45 centrally contracted players had yet to take the test and six others had failed at least one attempt, leaving 24 who had passed. The reasons varied and included injuries and logistics. That means the “yet to test” group should not be described as having failed.
Why Hasaranga and Pathirana drew attention
Both players were high-profile IPL signings, so their clearance had immediate consequences for Lucknow Super Giants and Kolkata Knight Riders. Hasaranga had suffered a hamstring problem during the T20 World Cup, while Pathirana was also working through rehabilitation. SLC had previously said injured players would be tested once their recovery programmes allowed it.
For franchises, the uncertainty affects squad planning; for SLC, the policy is about keeping centrally contracted players at a defined physical standard before releasing them to a demanding overseas tournament.
Fitness tests are only one part of return-to-play
A performance test is not the same as a medical examination. Return-to-play decisions typically combine injury healing, strength and conditioning data, workload progression and sport-specific readiness. A player can be medically improved but not yet ready to meet a board’s conditioning threshold, or can pass a general test while still requiring careful workload management.
That distinction is especially relevant for fast bowlers such as Pathirana, whose return is influenced by repeated high-intensity bowling loads, and for an all-rounder such as Hasaranga, who must tolerate batting, fielding and bowling demands.
Sources checked
Why the distinction matters
Fitness and health-related sports stories can easily blur medical recovery, performance testing and selection decisions. A player being unavailable for a fitness test is not the same as failing one, and a failed test does not necessarily mean a long-term injury. The relevant governing body, club or medical team should be treated as the primary source for clearance decisions.
For public-health stories, patients should follow official NHS guidance rather than infer personal medical advice from a news report. Emergency and urgent services remain available during industrial action, while planned care may be rescheduled. Anyone with a specific concern should contact their clinical team, NHS 111 or emergency services as appropriate.
Verification and reader note
This page has been updated to separate the original fitness report from later information that became available after publication. Dates, official announcements and later outcomes are stated explicitly so that readers can tell which details were known at the time and which were confirmed later.
For any decision that depends on current conditions, readers should check the relevant primary source before acting. News pages can explain context, but official organisations, event operators, regulators, clubs, public authorities or product vendors remain the best source for live status and formal rules.
Key questions to keep in mind
The most useful way to follow Hasaranga and Pathirana Fitness Tests: SLC Rules and IPL Clearance is to separate three layers of information: the confirmed event or announcement, the interpretation offered by interested parties, and the practical effect on readers. Those layers often become mixed together when a story develops quickly.
A strong update should therefore identify the date of the original claim, say who made it, record what happened afterwards and avoid turning uncertainty into certainty. That approach is especially important when the subject involves forecasts, negotiations, product leaks, medical availability, financial distress or security risks.
What to check before relying on the headline
Headlines compress a complicated story into a few words. Before relying on one for a purchase, journey, financial decision, security action or other practical step, check the publication date and whether a later official update has changed the position. Also check whether figures refer to the UK as a whole, one city, one organisation or a specific reporting period.
This distinction prevents old breaking-news language from being mistaken for a current status. It also makes the article more useful months later, because readers can see both the original context and the later verified position.

