The dramatic collapse of the iconic British high street name WH Smith has taken another controversial turn. New reports reveal that the owner behind the rebranded former WH Smith stores is charging the struggling retail chain millions of pounds simply to use its newly invented “family-style” brand name, TG Jones.
The revelation has sparked outrage among retail analysts, landlords, suppliers, and customers alike — especially as the chain faces possible administration, store closures, and job losses across the UK.
For many observers, the arrangement raises serious questions about how modern private equity firms manage struggling retailers — and whether these financial structures are helping businesses survive or pushing them closer to collapse.
The End of WH Smith on the British High Street
For generations of British shoppers, WHSmith was a familiar part of everyday life. The retailer had operated continuously since 1792 and became one of the most recognisable names on UK high streets.
The company sold books, newspapers, stationery, snacks, magazines, and school supplies, becoming deeply woven into British culture over more than two centuries.
However, changing shopping habits, online competition, and declining footfall gradually weakened the traditional high street business model. While WH Smith’s travel division — located in airports, train stations, and hospitals — continued to grow profitably, its town-centre stores struggled.
In 2025, WH Smith sold roughly 480 high street stores to Modella Capital for approximately £76 million. The travel division retained the WH Smith name, while the acquired high street stores were rebranded as TG Jones.
The move officially marked the end of one of Britain’s oldest and most iconic retail brands from the high street.
Why Was WH Smith Rebranded as TG Jones?
When Modella Capital announced the rebrand, many consumers were confused by the unfamiliar name “TG Jones.”
At the time, the company claimed the name was chosen to preserve a “family business” feel similar to WH Smith. Reports suggested the branding aimed to sound traditional, British, and trustworthy.
But the strategy appears to have backfired badly.
Many customers failed to recognise the new stores, while others simply assumed they were independent discount shops unrelated to WH Smith. Analysts now say the rebrand caused a major loss of customer awareness and damaged sales.
Internal documents reportedly acknowledged that abandoning the WH Smith identity harmed trade and weakened the business almost immediately.
The irony is difficult to ignore: a retailer spent decades building a famous national brand, only for new owners to discard it and replace it with a fictional identity that consumers did not recognise.
The Royalty Fee Controversy Explained
The biggest controversy emerged when reports revealed that Modella Capital had structured the business so the operating retail company must pay fees to use the TG Jones name.
Under the arrangement, TG Jones stores reportedly pay 1.03% of monthly net revenue to a Modella-owned licensing company. If a restructuring plan is approved, the fee could reportedly rise to as much as 15% of net revenue.
Critics argue this means the retailer is effectively paying millions to use a brand name that did not previously exist and was created by the same owners controlling the company.
The structure has triggered accusations of “asset stripping” and financial engineering.
Retail experts say such arrangements are common in private equity ownership models, where intellectual property and branding rights are separated from the operating business. This allows parent firms to continue collecting royalties even if stores become financially distressed.
The issue becomes especially controversial when struggling retailers owe money to suppliers, landlords, and tax authorities.
Why Experts Are Concerned
The main concern surrounding the TG Jones royalty arrangement is simple: every pound paid in licensing fees is money that cannot be used to stabilise stores, pay suppliers, invest in staff, or improve operations.
At a time when the chain is already suffering losses, critics say the royalty system risks accelerating financial decline.
Reports indicate the business has already accumulated £2.9 million in unpaid licence fees.
Meanwhile, the retailer is reportedly carrying:
- £4 million owed to suppliers
- £3.4 million in deferred business rates
- £8.4 million in unpaid tax liabilities
- Significant operational losses estimated at £18.6 million
Many landlords are also being asked to accept rent reductions or temporary rent holidays to help the company survive.
For critics, the optics are troubling: suppliers and landlords may lose money while the parent company continues charging brand royalties.
Up to 150 Stores Could Close
The crisis surrounding TG Jones has intensified because the company is now considering a major restructuring plan that could close as many as 150 stores.
According to reports published this week, hundreds of jobs could be at risk if the plan proceeds.
The retailer currently operates around 450 remaining stores after several early closures.
If creditors reject the restructuring proposal, the company has warned it could enter administration.
This would represent yet another devastating blow for the UK high street, which has already seen the collapse or downsizing of brands including Debenhams, Wilko, Paperchase, and Topshop over the past decade.
The Bigger Problem Facing Britain’s High Streets
The TG Jones controversy also highlights the wider crisis facing Britain’s town centres.
Even before the rebrand, traditional high street retail had been under severe pressure from:
- Online shopping growth
- Rising business rates
- Increased energy costs
- Inflation
- Weak consumer spending
- Declining foot traffic
- Higher wage costs
Retailers that rely heavily on books, stationery, newspapers, and magazines have been especially vulnerable because many of these products are increasingly purchased digitally.
WH Smith’s own strategy reflected this reality. The company focused aggressively on travel retail because airport and train station locations generate more reliable footfall and stronger margins.
In contrast, many town-centre stores became financially difficult to maintain.
Public Reaction Has Been Fierce
Public reaction online has been highly critical of the TG Jones licensing arrangement.
On Reddit and social media, many users accused the ownership structure of prioritising financial extraction over retail recovery.
Some commenters described the system as “asset stripping,” while others argued it demonstrates how private equity ownership can weaken already struggling businesses.
Others pointed out that large corporations often use intellectual property licensing structures to move profits between related companies.
The strongest criticism focused on the idea that TG Jones is paying substantial fees for a brand identity that consumers barely recognise.
Many users argued that retaining the WH Smith name would likely have been far more valuable commercially than inventing a replacement brand and charging royalties for its use.
Who Owns Modella Capital?
Modella Capital is a private investment firm known for acquiring distressed or underperforming retail businesses.
The company has been involved with several struggling retail brands, including Hobbycraft, Claire’s UK, and The Original Factory Shop.
Recent scrutiny has intensified after some Modella-backed retail businesses encountered financial trouble. Reports suggest landlords and suppliers are increasingly wary of restructuring proposals linked to the firm.
Supporters of private equity ownership argue these firms often rescue businesses that might otherwise collapse immediately.
Critics counter that aggressive financial restructuring can sometimes prioritise short-term extraction over long-term retail investment.
The TG Jones situation has become a major example in this debate.
Why the WH Smith Brand Still Matters
One key lesson from the controversy is the enormous value of retail brand recognition.
WH Smith spent more than 230 years building familiarity and trust with British consumers. Even shoppers who criticised its stores still recognised the brand instantly.
Replacing such a deeply established identity was always risky.
Retail analysts now say the rebrand likely underestimated how emotionally attached many consumers remained to the WH Smith name.
In fact, reports indicate stores that retained older WH Smith signage sometimes performed better than fully rebranded TG Jones locations.
This highlights a powerful truth in retail marketing: familiarity often matters more than companies realise.
A recognisable name can drive customer confidence, foot traffic, and impulse spending — especially during difficult economic conditions.
Could TG Jones Still Survive?
Despite the negative headlines, survival is still possible.
The restructuring proposal reportedly includes:
- New investment funding
- Rent reductions
- Store closures
- Operational changes
- Temporary limits on royalty payments
Supporters believe the chain still has strengths, including:
- Strong town-centre locations
- Existing customer habits
- Post Office partnerships
- Toys “R” Us concessions
- Stationery and convenience demand
However, success will likely depend on rebuilding customer trust and creating a clearer retail identity.
At present, many consumers remain uncertain about what TG Jones actually represents.
What Happens If the Restructuring Fails?
If creditors reject the restructuring proposal, administration becomes a serious possibility.
Administration could lead to:
- Rapid store closures
- Major job losses
- Supplier losses
- Reduced landlord payments
- Potential liquidation of assets
The collapse would also leave another large gap on Britain’s struggling high streets.
Many towns already face rising vacancy rates after years of retail closures.
Former department stores, fashion retailers, and chain outlets have disappeared across the country, changing the character of many town centres permanently.
The downfall of another long-established chain would deepen concerns about the future of physical retail in Britain.
Lessons for the Retail Industry
The TG Jones controversy offers several important lessons for retailers and investors alike.
- Brand identity matters enormously
Consumers build emotional relationships with familiar retail names. Replacing trusted brands can create confusion and damage loyalty.
- Financial engineering cannot replace customer demand
Royalty structures and restructuring plans may improve accounting positions temporarily, but long-term success still depends on attracting shoppers.
- The UK high street remains fragile
Even established retailers face enormous pressure from changing consumer habits and economic uncertainty.
- Customers increasingly scrutinise corporate behaviour
Modern consumers pay attention not only to prices and products but also to how companies operate financially and ethically.
Could WH Smith Ever Return to the High Street?
Technically, the WH Smith brand still exists — but only through the company’s travel division.
The original business continues operating successfully in:
- Airports
- Railway stations
- Hospitals
- Service stations
Because WH Smith retained ownership of its core brand name during the sale, TG Jones cannot simply switch back.
Whether WH Smith could ever re-enter the high street independently remains unclear.
Given the company’s current focus on international travel retail, a return appears unlikely in the near future.
Still, the public reaction to TG Jones demonstrates how much affection many Britons still hold for the original WH Smith brand.
Final Thoughts
The revelation that former WH Smith stores are paying royalty fees to use the fictional TG Jones brand has intensified scrutiny of modern retail ownership models.
For many shoppers, the situation feels deeply symbolic of the wider decline of the British high street: beloved brands disappearing, financial restructuring replacing retail investment, and historic names being sacrificed in pursuit of new strategies.
Whether TG Jones survives may ultimately depend less on licensing agreements and more on something far simpler — convincing customers to walk through the doors again.
Right now, that remains the company’s biggest challenge.
About The Author
